It is clear that RhoA activates the DRF (diaphanous-related formin) mDia2 by disrupting the molecular interaction between the DAD (diaphanous autoregulatory domain) and the DID (diaphanous inhibitory domain). Previous studies indicate that a basic motif within the DAD contributes to mDia2 auto-inhibition, and results shown in the present study suggest these residues bind a conserved acidic region within the DID. Furthermore, we demonstrate that mDia2 is phosphorylated by ROCK (Rho-kinase) at two conserved residues (Thr1061 and Ser1070) just C-terminal to the DAD basic region. Phosphomimetic mutations to these residues in the context of the full-length molecule enhanced mDia2 activity as measured by increased actin polymerization, SRF (serum response factor)-dependent smooth muscle-specific gene transcription, and nuclear localization of myocardin-related transcription factor B. Biochemical and functional data indicate that the T1061E/S1070E mutation significantly inhibited the ability of DAD to interact with DID and enhanced mDia2 activation by RhoA. Taken together, the results of the present study indicate that ROCK-dependent phosphorylation of the mDia2 DAD is an important determinant of mDia2 activity and that this signalling mechanism affects actin polymerization and smooth muscle cell-specific gene expression.
- Rho-kinase (ROCK)
- diaphanousrelated formin
- serum response factor
- smooth muscle
The precise regulation of actin polymerization by the Rho family of small GTPases is essential for many important cellular functions, including adhesion, migration, polarity, cytokinesis and contraction. When bound to GTP, Rho, Rac and Cdc42 (cell division cycle 42) interact with a variety of effector molecules to induce the formation of stress fibres, lamellipodia and filopodia respectively. Of these effectors, the DRFs (diaphanous-related formins) mDia1, mDia2, mDia3 and FHOD1 [FH (formin homology) domain-containing protein 1] have received considerable attention because these proteins strongly catalyse actin nucleation and actin filament elongation and are regulated by specific interactions with the Rho GTPases. The DRFs are defined by the presence of two highly conserved FH domains (FH1 and FH2) that catalyse actin nucleation, a C-terminal DAD (diaphanous autoregulatory domain), an N-terminal DID (diaphanous inhibitory domain), and an N-terminal GBD (GTPase-binding domain) (see  and  for reviews). DRFs are maintained in an inactive conformation by a molecular interaction between DID and DAD (Figure 1A) [3,4]. Since the GBD- and DID-binding pockets slightly overlap, high-affinity binding of an activated GTPase to the GBD disrupts the DAD–DID interaction to expose the catalytically active FH1/FH2 domains [5,6]. Although the precise mechanism by which the DRFs stimulate actin polymerization is not fully understood, FH2-mediated actin filament elongation occurs at the barbed end and is enhanced by profilin binding to the FH1 domain.
In addition to its traditional role in controlling actin polymerization, RhoA signalling increases the expression of a variety of muscle differentiation and cytoskeletal genes by activating the SRF (serum response factor) (see  for a review). This effect is mediated by an actin polymerization-dependent depletion of G-actin (globular actin) pools that promotes the nuclear accumulation of the SRF co-factors, MRTF-A (myocardin-related transcription factor-A)/MKL-1 and MRTF-B/MKL-2 . We have previously shown that RhoA/MRTF-A signalling regulates many SMC [SM (smooth muscle) cell] differentiation marker genes (i.e. SM α-actin, SM22, and SM myosin heavy chain) [9,10], and that the RhoA effectors mDia1 and mDia2 play critical roles in this process . Importantly, MRTF-A- and MRTF-B-knockout mice exhibit defects in SMC differentiation marker gene expression, supporting a role for RhoA/MRTF signalling in the regulation of vascular development and perhaps in the progression of vascular disease [12–15]. Furthermore, a recent study by Medjkane et al.  demonstrated that MRTF-A was required for breast cancer cell metastasis because it regulates the expression of genes required for cell migration and invasion.
Given the importance of the DRFs in regulating actin-dependent cellular processes, it will be critical to identify the molecular mechanisms that regulate their activities. Since most studies have focused on DRF activation by the small GTPases, it is unclear whether post-translational modifications or additional proteins play a significant role. Interestingly, a polybasic region C-terminal to the core DAD domain is highly conserved in all four DRF members. Although not absolutely required for the DID–DAD interaction, studies suggest that it may contribute to DRF auto-inhibition [17,18]. Moreover, Takeya et al.  have demonstrated that several serine/threonine residues near the basic domain of FHOD1 are targets of ROCK (Rho-kinase), and that phosphorylation of these residues inhibits the DID–DAD interaction to fully activate FHOD1. Recent studies in our laboratory suggest that FHOD1 is phosphorylated by ROCK in SMCs and that this signalling mechanism regulates SMC-specific gene expression . Interestingly, mDia2 contains two highly conserved potential phosphorylation sites, Thr1061 and Ser1070, just C-terminal to the DAD basic region, but whether mDia2 activity is regulated by a similar mechanism is currently unknown. The goals of the present study were to more fully characterize the electrostatic interactions by which the mDia2 basic domain stabilizes the DID–DAD interaction, to test whether phosphorylation of Thr1061 and/or Ser1070 plays a significant role in mDia2 activation, and if so, to determine the physiological consequences of this mechanism.
Plasmids and reagents
The mDia2 and ROCK1 expression plasmids were gifts from Shuh Narumiya (Department of Pharmacology, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan) [19,21]. C3 transferase was a gift from Keith Burridge (Cell and Developmental Biology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill School of Medicine, NC, U.S.A.) . The mDia2 ΔGBD (amino acids 256–1172), ΔDAD (1–1030), NTer (1–533), DAD (1030–1171) and F1F2-C (533–1172) fragments were generated by PCR and sub-cloned into pcDNA3.1 and pEGFP expression plasmids (Clonetech) and the pGEX-4T1 vector (Amersham Biosciences). The Ser1070 and Thr1061 alanine or glutamate mutations were made by the QuikChange® site-directed mutagenesis kit (Stratagene). Antibodies used were as follows: anti-ROCK1, anti-actin and anti-Myc (Cell Signaling Technology), M2-FLAG (Sigma), anti-GFP (green fluorescent protein; BioDesign) and mDia2 (gift from Henry Higgs, Department of Biochemistry, Dartmouth Medical School, Hanover, NH, U.S.A.). Chemical reagents used were as follows: Y-27632, calyculin A and latrunculin B (Calbiochem); jasplakinolide (EMD chemicals) and okadaic acid (MP Biomedicals).
Transient transfections and reporter gene assays
The maintenance and transfection of multipotential 10T1/2 cells were performed as described previously . In brief, cells were maintained in 48-well plates in 10% serum and were transfected 24 h after plating at 70–80% confluency using the transfection reagent TransIT-LT1 (Mirus), following the manufacturer's protocol. Luciferase assays (Promega) were conducted 24 h following transfection. The SM22, SM α-actin and c-Fos promoters have been described previously [23,24].
GST (glutathione transferase)-fusion protein expression
GST-fusion protein expression was induced in BL-21 bacteria by 100 μM isopropyl β-D-thiogalactopyranoside for 18 h at room temperature (22 °C). Following bacterial lysis, GST-fusion proteins were purified using glutathione–Sepharose beads (Sigma).
In vitro and in vivo kinase assays
In vitro ROCK assays were performed as described previously . In brief, ROCK1Δ3 expressed in, and immunoprecipitated from, Cos-7 cells was incubated for 30 min at 30 °C in 25 μl of kinase buffer containing 250 μM ATP, 10 μCi of [γ-32P]ATP and 1 μg of GST–mDia2 DAD fusion protein. The ROCK inhibitor Y-27632 (10 μM) was added to some reactions prior to kinase addition. For in vivo 32P phosphate labelling, Cos-7 cells were transfected with either wild-type or phosphorylation mutants of FLAG-tagged mDia2±Myc–ROCK1Δ3. Cells were pre-incubated with phosphate-free medium for 3 h and then labelled with 1 mCi/ml [32P]Pi for 2 h. Some cells were treated with okadaic acid (1 μM) for 1 h before harvest. mDia2 was then immunoprecipitated using M2-FLAG antibody conjugated to agarose beads (Sigma) and analysed by autoradiography and Western blotting.
Phosphorylation mobility shifts
HeLa cells were treated with Y-27632 (or vehicle) for 1 h and then with calyculin A (or vehicle) for an additional 1 h. RIPA (50 mM Hepes, pH 7.2, 150 mM NaCl, 2 mM EDTA, 0.1% Nonidet P-40, 0.05% sodium deoxycholate and 0.5% Triton X-100) lysates were run on SDS/PAGE (7% gel) and subjected to Western blot analysis. For SAP (shrimp alkaline phosphatase) (Roche) treatments, 20 μg of total protein was incubated with 5 units of SAP for 30 min at 37 °C prior to loading.
Immunoprecipitation and protein expression
Cells were lysed in buffer A (50 mM Tris/HCl, pH 7.2, 150 mM NaCl, 0.2 mM EDTA, 1% Nonidet P40 and 0.5% Triton X-100) and cleared by centrifugation for 15 min at 20000 g at 4 °C. For co-immunoprecipitations, lysates were incubated with the appropriate Sepharose-conjugated antibody at 4 °C for 3 h and beads were washed three times with 1 ml of buffer A. Immunoprecipitants were separated by SDS/PAGE and transferred on to nitrocellulose membranes for Western blotting.
Actin sedimentation assays
Transfected HeLa cells were serum-starved for 48 h and then subjected to the actin sedimentation assay as described previously . In brief, after centrifugation of cell lysates at 50000 rev./min in a Beckman TLA-100.3 for 1 h and resuspension in equal amounts of sample buffer, levels of G-actin in the supernatant and F-actin (filamentous actin) in the pellet were measured by Western blotting.
HeLa or 10T1/2 cells were plated and transfected in four-well chamber slides, and maintained overnight in medium containing 10% serum. Cells were serum-starved for 16 h, fixed in 3.7% paraformaldehyde/PBS for 20 min, and permeabilized in 0.5% Triton X-100/PBS for 3 min. The M2-FLAG antibody (Sigma) was diluted 1:500 in 20% goat serum/3% BSA in PBS and incubated with the fixed cells for 2 h. Texas Red- or FITC- (Jackson ImmunoResearch) conjugated secondary antibodies were used at 1:1000, whereas Alexa Fluor® 555 phalloidin (Molecular Probes) and DAPI (4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole; Molecular Probes) were used at 1:100 and 1 nM respectively.
A DID acidic domain contributes to mDia2 auto-inhibition
The auto-inhibitory interaction between the amphipathic DAD core motif (see Figure 1A) and the hydrophobic DID binding pocket has been well characterized by a variety of structural and functional analyses [1,5,26]. Interestingly, additional studies on mDia2 and FHOD1 suggest that a string of basic amino acids just C-terminal to the core DAD may also be important [17,18]. However, due to a lack of crystal structure data on the basic domain and an inability to identify the acidic DID residues with which it interacts, its precise role in regulating mDia2 activity is not completely clear.
To better characterize the molecular interactions that regulate mDia2 auto-inhibition, we performed structure–function analyses using well-established assays of mDia2 activity. As shown in Figure 1(B), expression of FLAG-tagged full-length mDia2 failed to enhance stress fibre formation, as measured by phalloidin staining, or actin polymerization, as measured by actin sedimentation assays. These results reflect the auto-inhibited state of the full-length molecule. In contrast, expression of a full-length mDia2 variant containing a double alanine mutation within the basic domain (R1058A/K1059A) enhanced actin polymerization in both assays, confirming this domain's role in mDia2 auto-inhibition. We have previously shown that activation of mDia2 strongly stimulated SRF-dependent SMC-specific gene transcription in multi-potential 10T1/2 cells . As expected, the R1058A/K1059A mDia2 variant significantly activated the SM α-actin and SM22 promoters in this model but did not activate c-Fos, an SRF-dependent promoter not regulated by actin polymerization (Figure 1C). Importantly, R1058A/K1059A-dependent promoter activation was not as strong as that observed with an mDia2 variant lacking the entire DAD domain (see the schematic diagram in Figure 1E) and was completely inhibited by co-expression of C3 transferase (Figure 1D). These results strongly suggest that basic domain mutations do not render mDia2 constitutively active, but instead enhance RhoA-mediated mDia2 activity. The ability of latrunculin B to inhibit the transcriptional effects of the R1058A/K1059A mDia2 variant indicates that this response is mediated by actin polymerization.
Given the sensitivity of the SRF/MRTF-dependent transcription assay, we used this model to screen the DID domain for residues that may interact with the DAD basic region. The DID-binding pocket consists of five armadillo repeats with all five β-helices making contact with the hydrophobic face of the amphipathic DAD helix . Although the basic domain did not show sufficient order to be placed into the DID–DAD crystal structure, it probably extends C-terminally from the core DAD sequence towards the α5B helix of the DID. On the basis of sequence conservation (between species and other DRF family members; see Figure 2A) and positioning within the α5B helix, we hypothesized that a trio of acidic residues (Glu376, Glu377 and Asp378) were important for the DID–DAD interaction. To test this directly, we generated a E377A/D378A mutation in full-length mDia2 and found that this variant enhanced SMC-specific promoter activity by 20-fold (Figure 2B) and enhanced phalloidin staining when expressed in cells (Figure 2C). Importantly, co-immunoprecipitation assays (with N-terminal mDia2 fragments) clearly demonstrated that the E377A/D378A mutation inhibited the DID–DAD interaction (Figure 2D). As an alternative measure of DID–DAD binding, we used an assay originally described by Copeland et al.  that is based upon the ability of the N-terminal half of mDia2 (see Figure 1E) to inhibit the transcriptional activity of the C-terminal half of mDia2 even when these fragments are expressed as separate molecules. As expected, expression of the wild-type N-terminal fragment attenuated the activation of the SM22 promoter by the C-terminal fragment, whereas the N-terminal fragment containing the E377A/D378A double mutation had no significant effect in this model (Figure 2E).
The mDia2 DAD domain is phosphorylated by ROCK
Our results described above suggested that an electrophilic interaction between the DAD basic and DID acidic domains regulates mDia2 auto-inhibition. Given the presence of two highly conserved potential phosphorylation sites, Thr1061 and Ser1070, just C-terminal to the DAD basic region (Figure 3A), we hypothesized that phosphorylation of these residues would inhibit the basic region's contributions to the DID–DAD interaction. Each of these residues lies within a consensus sequence (RXS/T) that is targeted by basic domain kinases such as PKA (protein kinase A), PKG (protein kinase G) and ROCK . However, on the basis of the demonstration that ROCK phosphorylated similar sequences in FHOD1 and LIM kinase [19,25], we postulated that mDia2 was a substrate for this enzyme. Indeed, we detected an interaction between endogenous ROCK1 and mDia2 in HeLa cells by co-immunoprecipitation (Figure 3B), strongly supporting this idea. In vitro kinase assays demonstrated that constitutively active ROCK1Δ3 immunoprecipitated from Cos-7 cells strongly phosphorylated a GST-fusion protein containing the C-terminal half of mDia2 (Figure 3C). Importantly, 32P incorporation was partially inhibited by single T1061A or S1070A mutations and almost completely inhibited by the double alanine mutation (2A; T1061A/S1070A). DAD phosphorylation in these in vitro assays was also attenuated by the ROCK inhibitor Y-27632.
As shown in Figure 3(D), nearly identical results were observed in vivo when DAD phosphorylation was measured in Cos-7 cells also overexpressing ROCK1Δ3. Interestingly, even in the absence of ROCK1Δ3, phosphorylation of the mDia2 DAD peptide was dramatically up-regulated in cells pre-treated with okadaic acid, indicating that DAD phosphorylation was maintained at low levels by phosphatase activity. Importantly, addition of the ROCK inhibitor Y-27632 prior to and during okadaic acid treatment significantly reduced DAD phosphorylation, providing strong evidence that the mDia2 DAD is a target for ROCK. Expression of ROCK1Δ3 also increased phosphorylation of full-length mDia2, and in excellent agreement with our in vitro experiments, this increase was partially reduced by the single T1061A and S1070A mutations, and completely eliminated by the double alanine mutation (Figure 3E). Interestingly, when the phosphomimetic glutamate mutations were used in these assays, the single T1061E mutation dramatically inhibited mDia2 phosphorylation (Figure 3F), perhaps suggesting that the relatively minor effect of the single T1061A mutation was due to compensatory phosphorylation of the Ser1070 site. We also found that the mobility of endogenous mDia2 was decreased by treatment of cells with the phosphatase inhibitor calyculin A, and that this mobility shift was prevented by pre-treatment of cells with Y-27632, incubation of lysates with SAP or mutation of both phosphorylation sites (Figure 3G). Additional in vivo phosphorylation experiments indicated that mDia2 was not a substrate for PKA, PKG or MAPK (mitogen-activated protein kinase; see Supplementary Figure S1 at http://www.BiochemJ.org/bj/439/bj4390057add.htm and results not shown).
Thr1061/Ser1070 phosphorylation inhibited DAD binding to DID
To test whether phosphorylation of Thr1061 and Ser1070 could interfere with the basic region's role in stabilizing the mDia2 DID–DAD interaction, we generated a phosphomimetic variant of the mDia2 DAD that contained glutamate substitutions at both residues (2E; T1061E/S1070E) and performed co-immunoprecipitation assays with the wild-type and DAD 2E variants. As shown in Figure 4(A), wild-type DAD efficiently precipitated the N-terminal mDia2 fragment, but this interaction was significantly reduced by the DAD 2E mutation. Another method used to study DID–DAD interactions is based upon the ability of exogenously expressed DAD peptides to stimulate endogenous mDia activity by competitively interfering with the DID–DAD interaction [11,17]. As expected, expression of wild-type FLAG–mDia2 DAD enhanced phalloidin staining (Figure 4B) and SM22 promoter activity (Figure 4C). In contrast, expression of the DAD 2E variant had little, if any, effect in these models, indicating that the DAD 2E variant does not bind to DID as effectively as wild-type. To directly determine whether phosphorylation reduced the DID–DAD interaction in vivo, we performed co-immunoprecipitations in calyculin-treated cells that exhibit strong DAD phosphorylation. As shown in Figure 4(D), calyculin treatment resulted in a significant decrease in the interaction between the N- and C-terminal mDia2 fragments. Importantly, this decrease was completely reversed by the DAD 2A mutation, but was mimicked by the DAD 2E mutation in the absence of calyculin. These results clearly support a model in which phosphorylation of the mDia2 DAD inhibits it association with the DID.
Phosphorylation of Thr1061/Ser1070 enhanced mDia2 activity
To begin to examine the consequences of Thr1061/Ser1070 phosphorylation on the function of full-length mDia2, we tested the effects of the DAD 2E phosphomimetic on actin polymerization. In contrast with wild-type mDia2, the DAD 2E mDia2 variant enhanced phalloidin staining (Figure 5A) and the amount of F-actin measured in actin sedimentation assays (Figure 5B), suggesting at least partial mDia2 activation by this mutation. We next examined the effect of the DAD 2E and phospho-deficient (DAD 2A) variants on mDia2's ability to stimulate SMC-specific gene transcription. As shown in Figure 5(C), the DAD 2E variant activated SMC-specific promoter activity more strongly than wild-type, even though these molecules were expressed at nearly identical levels. In contrast, the DAD 2A mutation had little effect on mDia2's ability to stimulate the SM22 promoter further, suggesting that basal levels of Thr1061/Ser1070 phosphorylation in 10T1/2 cells are relatively low. Expression of the mDia2 DAD 2E variant significantly increased the activity (Figure 5D) and nuclear accumulation (Figure 5E) of MRTF-B, providing additional evidence that phosphorylation of the mDia2 DAD enhances mDia2-mediated actin polymerization.
Phosphorylation enhances RhoA-mediated activation of mDia2
It has been suggested that GTPase binding to the GBD is not sufficient to fully activate DRF-dependent actin polymerization and that an additional, as yet undescribed signal, may also be required . Results shown in Figure 6(A) demonstrate that the activity of the mDia2 phosphomimetic, unlike that of mDia2ΔGBD, was strongly inhibited by co-transfection of the RhoA inhibitor C3 transferase. When coupled with the observation that these mutations do not result in full mDia2 activation, we hypothesized that elimination of this stabilizing interaction renders mDia2 more sensitive to activation by RhoA. In support of this, the DAD 2E variant was synergistically activated by L63RhoA to a much greater extent than wild-type mDia2 or the DAD 2A variant (Figure 6B).
It is clear that mDia2 activity is inhibited by the DID–DAD interaction and that RhoA binding displaces DAD from the DID-binding pocket to expose the catalytically active FH2 domain. Virtually nothing is known about additional signalling mechanisms that regulate mDia2 activity, and the goal of the present study was to examine the effects of phosphorylation on this process. Our results demonstrate that the mDia2 DAD is phosphorylated at Thr1061 and Ser1070 by ROCK. These modifications weaken the DID–DAD interaction, sensitizing the phosphorylated form to activation by RhoA. Direct cross-talk between these two RhoA effectors should have important implications on a number of physiological processes that involve RhoA-dependent regulation of actin polymerization.
The core DAD sequence MDSLLEAL is critically important for the DID–DAD interaction, and crystal structure analyses of mDia1 have demonstrated that this region forms an amphipathic helix that binds tightly to a hydrophobic pocket on the DID surface . Mutation analyses by Wallar et al.  implicated the basic region (RRKR) N-terminal to the core domain in mDia2 regulation. These authors demonstrated that single glutamate substitutions at any one of these residues resulted in a significant reduction in DAD affinity for DID and prevented exogenously expressed DAD from activating endogenous mDia. Our demonstration that the T1061E/S107E phosphomimetic enhanced mDia2 activity in the context of the full-length molecule and inhibited the effects of overexpressed DAD peptides fits well with these results. Moreover, Takeya et al.  demonstrated that FHOD1 was phosphorylated by ROCK at several residues C-terminal to the core DAD and that phosphorylation inhibited the interaction of the DAD with the putative FHOD1 DID. Similar basic sequences are found in mDia1 and mDia3, but only mDia2 and FHOD1 have conserved consensus ROCK phosphorylation sites near this domain, suggesting differential regulation of the DRFs by this mechanism. It is certainly possible that Thr1061 and/or Ser1070 are targeted by additional kinases, but our results from the present study would suggest that any such phosphorylation would enhance RhoA-dependent mDia2 activation.
The identification of conserved acidic residues in DID that potentially interact with the basic domain (amino acids 376–378) extends our understanding of the molecular interactions that regulate DID–DAD binding and mDia2 activity. During the completion of the present study, Lammers et al.  used isothermal titration calorimetry to demonstrate that the corresponding acidic residues of mDia1 (see Figure 1C) were important for DID–DAD binding, strongly supporting a role for this acidic region in DRF auto-inhibition. It will certainly be important to further characterize this region by additional structural studies.
Our results from the present study also suggest that mDia2 phosphorylation is maintained at relatively low levels by the type 1 or 2 phosphatases that are targets of okadaic acid and calyculin A. These findings are intriguing, since phosphatases have previously been shown to regulate several RhoGTPase effectors (see  for a review). For example, two PP2A (protein phosphatase 2A)-related phosphatases (POPX1 and POPX2) inhibited lamellipodia and membrane ruffle formation by inactivating the Cdc42/Rac effector PAK (p21-activated kinase) . Interestingly, POPX2 was also identified as an mDia1-binding partner and inhibitor of SRF transcription and MRTF-A nuclear translocation . However, phosphorylation of mDia1 has not yet been reported, and it is unclear whether phosphatase activity was required for this effect.
Although difficult to determine at present, the timing of DAD phosphorylation during the mDia2 activation cycle could have important implications on the regulation of mDia2 activity. For example, since mDia2 activation is essentially determined by competitive binding of RhoA and DAD to the GBD/DID domain, a phosphorylation-mediated weakening of the DID–DAD interaction might favour RhoA binding and initial activation. Alternatively, DAD phosphorylation that occurred subsequent to RhoA binding could prevent the re-association of the DID–DAD complex, leading to prolonged mDia2 activity. In support of the latter mechanism, we observed that introducing an mDia2 N-terminal DID fragment (amino acids 1–533) into our in vitro reaction inhibited phosphorylation of the C-terminal DAD fragment (see Supplementary Figure S2 at http://www.BiochemJ.org/bj/439/bj4390057add.htm), suggesting that the auto-inhibited conformation limits ROCK's access to the DAD domain.
The precise physiological significance of mDia2 activation by ROCK is not completely clear. However, given that this mechanism occurs downstream of RhoA, we hypothesize that it allows for more dynamic temporal or spatial control of actin polymerization. This could be particularly relevant at the leading edge of migrating cells where precise actin polymerization is required for cell extension. In addition, since mDia2 activity has been shown to be targeted to filopodia by Cdc42 and Rif [34–36], it will be important to test the effects of phosphorylation on the extent and specificity of mDia2 activation by these small GTPases. ROCK and mDia2 activity are clearly important for SMC-specific gene expression , and it is likely that this mechanism contributes to the regulation of SMC differentiation. ROCK is also a major regulator of SMC contractility, and this mechanism could help ensure that levels of actin contractile fibres are sufficient to maintain correct SMC tone.
In summary, the results from the present study indicate that ROCK regulates mDia2 activity by phosphorylating the DAD at conserved residues near the basic region. This phosphorylation interferes with the intramolecular DID–DAD interaction and facilitates the activation of mDia2 by RhoA, resulting in increased actin polymerization. Given the importance of mDia2 in a number of physiological processes (especially in SMC), and the fact that this pathway links two important RhoA effectors, it will be critical to further characterize this signalling mechanism.
Dean Staus conceived, designed and performed most experiments and wrote the majority of the paper. Joan Taylor helped conceive and design the research, and critically revised the paper. Christopher Mack helped conceive, design and perform the research, and helped write and revise the paper.
This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health [grant number HL-070953 (to C.P.M.)] and the American Heart Association [grant number 07152340U (to D.P.S.)].
Abbreviations: Cdc42, cell division cycle 42; DAD, diaphanous autoregulatory domain; DAD, 2A; DAD, T1061A/S1070A; DAD, 2E, DAD T1061E/S1070E; DID, diaphanous inhibitory domain; DRF, diaphanous-related formin; F-actin, filamentous actin; FH, formin homology; FHOD1, formin homology domain-containing protein 1; G-actin, globular actin; GBD, GTPase-binding domain; GFP, green fluorescent protein; GST, glutathione transferase; MRTF, myocardin-related transcription factor; PKA, protein kinase A; PKG, protein kinase G, ROCK, Rho-kinase; SAP, shrimp alkaline phosphatase; SMC, smooth muscle cell; SRF, serum response factor
- © The Authors Journal compilation © 2011 Biochemical Society