Wild-type HIV-1 group O RT (reverse transcriptase) shows increased thermostability in comparison with HIV-1 group M subtype B RT and MLV (murine leukaemia virus) RT. However, its utility in the amplification of RNA targets is limited by the reduced accuracy of lentiviral RTs compared with oncoretroviral RTs (i.e. MLV RT). The effects of the mutations K65R, R78A and K65R/V75I on the fidelity of HIV-1 group O RTs were studied using gel-based and M13mp2 lacZ forward-mutation fidelity assays. Forward-mutation assays demonstrated that mutant RTs K65R, R78A and K65R/V75I showed >9-fold increased accuracy in comparison with the wild-type enzyme and were approximately two times more faithful than the MLV RT. Compared with MLV RT, all of the tested HIV-1 group O RT variants showed decreased frameshift fidelity. However, K65R RT showed a higher tendency to introduce one-nucleotide deletions in comparison with other HIV-1 group O RT variants. R78A had a destabilizing effect on the RT, either in the presence or absence of V75I. At temperatures above 52 °C, K65R and K65R/V75I retained similar levels of DNA polymerase activity to the wild-type HIV-1 group O RT, but were more efficient than HIV-1 group M subtype B and MLV RTs. K65R, K65R/V75I and R78A RTs showed decreased misinsertion and mispair extension fidelity in comparison with the wild-type enzyme for most base pairs studied. These assays revealed that nucleotide selection is mainly governed by kpol (pol is polymerization) in the case of K65R, whereas both kpol and Kd affect nucleotide discrimination in the case of K65R/V75I.
- DNA polymerase
- DNA-synthesis fidelity
- nucleotide incorporation
- reverse transcriptase
The HIV-1 RT (reverse transcriptase) is the enzyme responsible for the conversion of the viral genomic RNA into integration-competent double-stranded DNA . The HIV-1 RT is a heterodimeric enzyme composed of subunits of 66 and 51 kDa, designated p66 and p51 respectively. It shares structural homology with other DNA polymerases, including common subdomains (i.e. fingers, palm and thumb) that in p66 form the nucleic-acid-binding cleft. Asp110, Asp185 and Asp186 define the RT DNA polymerase active site in the palm of p66, which also contains an RNase H domain located at its C-terminus .
Reverse transcription is error prone and contributes to the high genetic variability of HIV-1. Studies with purified HIV-1 RT have revealed an unusually high error rate while copying DNA or RNA templates (for reviews, see [3,4]). Although reported error rates for HIV-1 RT show relatively large variability, ranging from 6×10−5 to 6.7×10−4, it is widely assumed that oncoretroviral RTs [e.g. MLV (murine leukaemia virus) RT or avian myeloblastosis virus RT] are ~10–15 times more faithful than lentiviral RTs, including the HIV-1 enzyme [5,6]. HIV-1 is characterized by its remarkable variability. HIV-1 variants are classified into four major phylogenetic groups, designated as M (main), O (outlier), N (non-M/non-O) and P [7,8]. There are at least nine genetically distinct subtypes (or clades) of HIV-1 group M: subtypes A, B, C, D, F, G, H, J and K. Subtype B has been the dominant form in Europe, the Americas, Japan and Australia, therefore HIV-1 group M subtype B RTs have been widely used as a reference in virological and biochemical studies (e.g. RTs from clones HXB2, BH10 or NL4-3).
Mutational studies with HIV-1 RT have shown that molecular determinants of nucleotide specificity and fidelity of DNA synthesis map within the p66 subunit, mostly at or in the vicinity of the dNTP-binding site (reviewed in ). Several amino acid substitutions in the HIV-1 RT (group M subtype B) have been shown to increase its intrinsic fidelity, as determined with the M13mp2 lacZα forward-mutation assay . Examples are F61A , K65R , L74V [11–13], V75I , D76V , R78A , V148I , Q151N [18,19] and M184I [13,20–22].
Group O HIV-1 RTs differ in ~21% of their amino acid sequence when compared with their homologous counterparts of subtype B, and contain amino acid substitutions that confer resistance to non-nucleoside RT inhibitors [23,24]. We have recently demonstrated that a WT (wild-type) HIV-1 group O RT variant (derived from the ESP49 clone) shows increased thermal stability in comparison with MLV RT and a prototypic HIV-1 group M subtype B RT (i.e. derived from the BH10 strain), while showing higher efficiency in reverse transcription–PCR assays that included a cDNA synthesis step performed at a high temperature range (57–69 °C) . In forward-mutation assays, the WT HIV-1 group O RT showed 2.5-fold increased accuracy in comparison with the WT BH10 RT, and replacing Ile75 with a valine residue produced a small additional increase in fidelity . In the present study, we have examined the effects of mutations K65R and R78A on the thermostability and fidelity of DNA synthesis of HIV-1 group O RTs in the presence or absence of V75I. K65R and R78A were chosen as mutations that produced large increases in the fidelity of HIV-1 group M subtype B RTs, while retaining significant DNA polymerase activity [11,16,26,27]. Our results show that mutations K65R and K65R/V75I do not affect the thermal stability of the enzyme, but increase its accuracy to similar levels as the MLV RT. Mechanistic insights into the role of both mutations in the fidelity of DNA synthesis were obtained from transient kinetic assays.
Mutagenesis, expression and purification of recombinant RTs
Site-directed mutagenesis was carried out with the QuikChange® site-directed mutagenesis kit (Stratagene), as decribed in the manufacturer's instructions and using the following mutagenic primers: 5′-CTTTGCTATAAAAAGGAAAGATAGTACTAAG-TGG-3′ and 5′-CCACTTAGTACTATCTTTCCTTTTTATAGCA-AAG-3′ for K65R, 5′-GCTGGTAGACTTTGCGGAATTAAAC-AAGAG-3′ and 5′-CTCTTGTTTAATTCCGCAAAGTCTACC-AGC-3′ for R78A, and 5′-GCTGATAGACTTTGCGGAATTA-AACAAGAGAAC-3′ and 5′-GTTCTCTTGTTTAATTCCGCA-AAGTCTATCAGC-3′ for the double mutant V75I/R78A. The plasmid p66RTB(O_WT) was used as a template in the mutagenesis reactions involving the specific primers for K65R, R78A and V75I/R78A . The double mutant K65R/V75I was obtained with the K65R mutagenic primers and the template p66RTB plasmid containing the DNA that encodes the V75I mutant of HIV-1 group O RT . After mutagenesis, the entire RT-coding regions were sequenced and, if correct, used for RT expression and purification.
Recombinant RTs were expressed and purified as previously described [25,28,29]. RTs were co-expressed with HIV-1 protease in Escherichia coli XL1 Blue to obtain p66/p51 heterodimers, which were later purified by ionic exchange followed by affinity chromatography. The purity of the enzymes was assessed by SDS/PAGE. Enzymes were quantified by active-site titration before biochemical studies . The MLV RT was obtained from Promega.
DNA polymerase activity assays
Assays were carried out in 50 mM Tris/HCl, pH 8.0, 20 mM NaCl, 10 mM MgCl2, 8 mM DTT (dithiothreitol), 50 μM [3H]dTTP (6–8 μCi/ml; 120–160 Ci/mol) (PerkinElmer) and 1 μM template–primer [poly(rA)/oligo(dT)16] (concentration expressed as 3′-hydroxy primer termini) [25,31]. The thermal stability of RTs was determined by measuring the residual RNA-dependent DNA polymerase activity, after pre-incubating 60 μl of buffer containing the enzyme and the template–primer for 5 min at different temperatures in the range 37–60 °C. For RT concentrations above 25 nM, pre-incubating the enzymes with the homopolymeric template–primer for up to 5 min at 37 °C had a minor effect on their specific DNA polymerase activity. Polymerization reactions were initiated by adding 30 μl of buffer containing [3H]dTTP. The final active RT concentrations in these assays were around 20 nM. At different times, aliquots (20 μl) were removed into 20 μl of 0.5 M EDTA and processed as described previously .
Reverse transcription–PCR assays
The effect of the temperature on the efficiency of the reverse transcription reaction catalysed by different RTs was determined by using a previously described two-step reverse transcription–PCR assay . DNA amplifications were carried out with the Expand High Fidelity DNA polymerase mix (Roche). PCR primers used in these assays were: 5′-CCTAGGCACCAGGG-TGTGAT-3′ (ACT1), 5′-CGTACTCCTGCTTGCTGATCC-3′ (ACT3), 5′-CTTCAGTGAGACAGGAGCTG-3′ (TUB1) and 5′-CCACAGAATCCACACCAACC-3′ (TUB2).
Pre-steady-state kinetic assays
Kinetic parameters for the incorporation of correct or incorrect nucleotides were determined as previously described [14,25], using 5′-32P-labelled 21P (5′-ATACTTTAACCATATGTATCC-3′) and 31T (5′- TTTTTTTTTAGGATACATATGGTTAAAGTAT-3′) as primer and template respectively. Three additional primers (21PT, 21PG and 21PA) that differ from 21P in having T, G or A (instead of C) at their 3′ terminus were used in mispair extension fidelity assays. Reactions were performed under single turnover conditions in a solution containing 50–100 nM (active sites) HIV-1 RT and a 100 nM concentration of template–primer 31T/21P, in RT buffer (50 mM Tris/HCl, pH 8.0, 50 mM KCl and 12–24 mM MgCl2), and a variable concentration of nucleotide. Reactions involving the incorporation of incorrect nucleotides or mispair extension kinetics (i.e. incorporation of dCTP, dGTP or dATP on 31T/21P, or the extension of G:T, G:G and G:A mispairs) were conducted with an excess concentration of the enzyme (120 nM) over the template–primer duplex (100 nM). These conditions were chosen to eliminate the influence of the enzyme turnover rate (kss), which interferes with the measurements of low incorporation rates.
M13mp2 lacZα forward-mutation assays
Gapped duplex M13mp2 DNA was prepared as described previously , and used as template–primer for DNA synthesis reactions using purified WT or mutant RTs. Gap-filling synthesis reactions were performed in a 10 μl reaction volume, containing 25 mM Tris/HCl, pH 8.0, 100 mM KCl, 2 mM DTT, 4 mM MgCl2, 250 μM of each dNTP (dATP, dGTP, dCTP and dTTP), 5 μg/ml gapped duplex DNA and 100 nM RT . The reactions were incubated at 37 °C for 30 min and then stopped by adding 1 μl of 60 mM EDTA. Polymerization products were electroporated into E. coli MC1061 host cells, and after a brief (10 min) recovery period, transformants were plated on to a bacterial indicator lawn (E. coli CSH50) in M9 plates containing 0.195 mM X-Gal (5-bromo-4-chloroindol-3-yl β-D-galactopyranoside) and 0.2 mM IPTG (isopropyl β-D-thiogalactopyranoside). Mutant plaques were picked, their phenotype confirmed and the phage replicative-form DNA isolated for nucleotide sequencing using primer 5′-GCTTGCTGCAACTCTCTCAG-3′ (Macrogen).
Error frequencies were calculated as described previously . At least ten fill-in reactions were performed for each enzyme. The nucleotide sequence of the entire gap region was determined for all mutant plaques. Specific error rates were derived by multiplying the corrected overall error frequency with the percentage of all mutations represented by the particular class of mutations (e.g. base substitutions). This number was divided by 0.6 (the average probability of an error being expressed in the M13mp2 assay)  and by the total number of sites where this class of mutations could be detected (e.g. 125 for base substitutions and 148 for frameshifts).
Thermal stability of RTs
The residual RNA-dependent DNA polymerase activity of WT and mutant RTs obtained after pre-incubating the enzymes for 5 min at different temperatures was determined in the presence of template–primer [i.e. poly(rA)/oligo(dT)16]. As shown in Figure 1, all tested enzymes showed similar amounts of residual activity after pre-incubations carried out at 42–48 °C. However, the MLV RT and the mutant O_R78A RT showed reduced DNA polymerase activity when the pre-incubation temperature was fixed at 50 °C. At higher temperatures (e.g. 54 °C), four HIV-1 group O RT derivatives (e.g., O_WT, O_V75I, O_K65R and O_K65R/V75I) retained 25–35% of their activity at 37 °C, whereas the residual activities of BH10_WT and MLV RTs remained below 6% and 3% respectively. Other HIV-1 group O RT variants, such as O_R78A and the double mutant O_V75I/R78A, were found to be less stable than the BH10_WT RT. These mutant enzymes showed poor nucleotide-incorporation efficiency at 37 °C, and their specific activities were the lowest among all of the tested RTs (see the legend to Figure 1). Although the differences were relatively small, the RT variants O_WT, O_K65R and O_K65R/V75I seem to be slightly more stable than the O_V75I RT, as demonstrated by the results obtained after pre-incubating the RTs and the template–primer at 56 °C.
The efficiency of reverse transcription at different temperatures was determined with a two-step reverse transcription–PCR assay including an initial cDNA synthesis reaction at a fixed temperature. The amplification of a 0.9 kb fragment of actin from mouse liver total RNA confirmed the reduced activity of the double mutant O_V75I/R78A RT in assays including a reverse transcription step at 42 °C (Figure 2A). In addition, this mutant showed no activity when the reverse transcription reactions were carried out at temperatures above 52 °C. Both O_V75I/R78A and O_R78A RTs showed a low reverse transcription–PCR efficiency in comparison with the other HIV-1 RTs. These results were confirmed by the amplification of tubulin transcripts of 1.2 kb (Figure 2B). In these assays, MLV RT performed slightly better than both mutants at 57 °C. Although most of the RTs were able to produce cDNA in the presence of a small amount of RNA (typically 10–50 ng), RNA inputs as high as 1 μg were required for efficient amplification of actin RNA in O_V75I/R78A RT-catalysed reactions (see Supplementary Figure S1 at http://www.BiochemJ.org/bj/436/bj4360599add.htm). In contrast, WT HIV-1 group O RT and its mutants K65R and K65R/V75I retained significant activity at temperatures as high as 65 °C in actin RNA amplifications, and also showed a better performance than the other RTs in tubulin RNA amplifications obtained after a reverse transcription step at 60 °C.
Pre-steady-state kinetic analysis of thermostable HIV-1 group O RTs
Misinsertion and mispair extension fidelity assays were used to estimate the accuracy of DNA synthesis catalysed by HIV-1 group O RTs. The kinetic parameters [kpol (pol is polymerization) and Kd] for the incorporation of correct (dTTP) and incorrect nucleotides (dCTP, dGTP or dATP) are given in Table 1. For dTTP incorporation, the catalytic efficiencies (kpol/Kd) of studied RTs were in the range 0.55–1.82 μM−1·s−1, with O_R78A RT showing the lowest values. However, the kpol/Kd values for the incorporation of C, G or A by mutant O_K65R and O_K65R/V75I RTs were largely reduced.
The double mutant K65R/V75I showed the highest misinsertion fidelities for the incorporation of A or C opposite to A, although the differences with the single mutant K65R were relatively small (Table 1; see Supplementary Figure S2A at http://www.BiochemJ.org/bj/436/bj4360599add.htm). The kinetic analysis showed that K65R produces a larger reduction of the kpol for the incorporation of incorrect dNTPs in comparison with V75I. In comparison with the WT enzyme, the mutant O_R78A RT showed similar misinsertion fidelity for the incorporation of G or A opposite to A, but increased efficiency of discrimination against C opposite to A.
The kinetics of mispair extension were determined by measuring the incorporation of a correct T opposite to A at the 3′ end of the primer, using template–primer duplexes containing matched (G:C) or mismatched (G:T, G:G or G:A) termini. The results are shown in Table 2. Mismatched extension ratios were in the range 0.24×10−3–2.3×10−3 for the G:T mispair, 0.18×10−4–3.95×10−4 for the G:G mispair and lower than 2.2×10−6 for the G:A mispair. By themselves, the mutations K65R and V75I produced a moderate increase in mispair extension fidelity, by rendering enzymes with 2.8–5.4-fold decreased mismatched extension ratios (Table 2 and Supplementary Figure S2B). However, the double mutant (O_K65R/V75I) showed 9.5- and 22.3-fold increases in mispair extension fidelity for G:T and G:G mismatches respectively, suggesting an additive effect of both mutations. In the case of G:T mismatches, the increased mispair extension fidelity of O_K65R/V75I RT can be attributed to a loss in nucleotide-binding affinity (a Kd effect). However, in the case of G:G, the effects are due to the kpol reduction observed for the incorporation of T on the mismatched template–primer. Interestingly, the single mutant O_R78A RT was also highly accurate in mispair extension assays carried out with template–primers bearing G:T or G:G mismatches. As in the case of the O_K65R/V75I RT, discrimination efficiencies for G:T and G:G mispair extensions resulted from Kd and kpol effects respectively.
M13mp2 lacZα forward-mutation assays
An M13mp2-based forward-mutation assay was used to analyse how amino acid substitutions in the HIV-1 group O RT could affect its intrinsic fidelity. Mutations generated when the RT copies the gapped region of the lacZ gene in M13mp2 can be scored by the number of plaques with an altered colour phenotype (pale blue or colourless) in a specific indicator strain. Silent mutations are not detected in this assay. However, M13mp2 lacZα forward-mutation assays provide a fidelity assessment based on a relatively large number of mutational target sites . In these assays, mutant RTs O_K65R, O_K65R/V75I and O_R78A were >9 times more faithful than the WT HIV-1 group O enzyme (Table 3). Moreover, their mutant frequencies were 1.5–2.3 times lower than those calculated for the MLV RT. Although V75I confers 1.7-fold increased fidelity when introduced in a WT HIV-1 group O RT sequence context, this amino acid substitution had no effect on the accuracy of the RT when the K65R mutation was present.
The mutational specificity of HIV-1 group O RTs bearing the amino acid substitutions K65R, K65R/V75I and R78A was determined after sequencing the lacZα mutants generated in the forward-mutation assays. Their mutational spectra (see Supplementary Figures S3–S5 at http://www.BiochemJ.org/bj/436/bj4360599add.htm) were compared with those obtained with WT HIV-1 group O RT and mutant V75I , as well as with the MLV RT (see Supplementary Figure S6 at http://www.BiochemJ.org/bj/436/bj4360599add.htm). Unlike the case of O_WT RT and mutant O_V75I RT, mutations generated by O_K65R, O_K65R/V75I and O_R78A RTs appeared to be scattered throughout the target lacZα sequence. A mutational hot spot located next to runs of Ts at positions −36 to −34, and involving mostly T→C substitutions was observed with mutant RTs O_K65R/V75I and O_R78A. The O_K65R RT showed different mutational hot spots, located at positions −66 (G→T substitutions), +148 (one-nucleotide deletions or G→T substitutions) and +151 (mostly G→C substitutions). Unlike the case of the WT enzyme (O_WT RT), frameshift errors represented 15.7–34.3% of all errors, in the mutational spectra generated by the mutants K65R, K65R/V75I and R78A (Table 4). However, MLV RT had a higher propensity to introduce frameshift mutations, and showed frameshift error rates that were 3.5–11 times higher than those calculated for the three mutant HIV-1 group O RTs. These enzymes showed a remarkable tendency to generate one-nucleotide deletions, which in the case of the single mutants K65R and R78A were predominantly located at non-runs. In addition, mutant O_K65R RT and to a lesser extent O_R78A RT showed a stronger tendency to generate transversions instead of transitions, a property shared by the MLV RT.
Mutational studies carried out with HIV-1 group M subtype B RTs allowed the identification of amino acid substitutions that produce significant increases in fidelity of DNA synthesis [10–22]. However, most of those amino acid changes have a negative effect on the specific DNA polymerase activity. Thus substituting an alanine residue for Phe61 produces an 11.7-fold increase in fidelity  while decreasing strand-displacement DNA synthesis, processivity and template–primer binding [32,33]. On the other hand, mutant RTs with the amino acid substitutions V148I or Q151N showed 8.7–13.1-fold increased accuracy in comparison with the WT enzyme, although their catalytic efficiencies of dNTP incorporation were >23 times lower, as determined by using pre-steady-state kinetics [17,19]. Interestingly, K65R, V75I and R78A were previously identified as mutations that increased fidelity without impairing the DNA polymerase activity of HIV-1BH10 RT [11,14,16]. HIV-1NL4-3 mutant frequencies were also reduced when two of those mutations (i.e. K65R and R78A) were introduced in the viral RT-coding region .
The interactions between the side chain of Lys65 and the γ-phosphate of the dNTP are important for the stabilization of the incoming nucleotide in the RT active site  (Figure 3). K65R confers resistance to dideoxynucleotide RT inhibitors and tenofovir, and this has been related to a reduction in the insertion rate (kpol) of the nucleotide analogue ([26,36,37]; reviewed in ). In addition, biochemical studies carried out with the HIV-1HXB2 RT demonstrated that K65R decreases mispair extension efficiency by reducing the catalytic rate of incorporation (kpol) of correct dNTPs on mismatched template–primers . These effects have been attributed in part to an incorrect positioning of the 3′ end of the mispaired primer relative to the dNTP-binding site . Our results obtained with HIV-1 group O RTs are consistent with the previously observed kpol effect. However, we have also observed a significant reduction (4–8-fold decrease) in nucleotide misinsertion efficiencies when the K65R substitution was present. The kpol reduction produced by K65R could be a consequence of the structural constraint imposed on Arg72, a residue that interacts with the β-phosphate of the incoming dNTP, due to the formation of a stacking interaction between the guanidinium planes of Arg65 and Arg72 . K65R exerts similar effects on the accuracy of HIV-1 group M subtype B and group O RTs, as determined in forward-mutation assays . Furthermore, with both types of RTs, the K65R mutation produces a higher ratio of transversions versus transitions and significant alterations in the mutational spectra. However, the K65R mutant displays increased frameshift fidelity over the WT HIV-1HXB2 RT, with a strong propensity to introduce deletions at nucleotide runs . In contrast, the O_K65R RT shows a higher proportion of frameshift errors compared with the WT enzyme and a marked tendency to generate one-nucleotide deletions at non-runs.
Val75 and Arg78 are located at the base of the β3–β4 hairpin loop (residues 56–77), a site containing several residues involved in interactions with the incoming dNTP that are important for drug resistance and fidelity of DNA synthesis (; reviewed in ). Both amino acids in the 66 kDa subunit of HIV-1 RT interact with the template nucleotide at position +1 (Figure 3). We have previously demonstrated that V75I produces a relatively modest increase in fidelity when introduced in HIV-1 RTs of groups M and O [14,25]. The mutational spectrum of the O_V75I RT was similar to that obtained with the WT enzyme . Available evidence indicates that, when introduced in HIV-1BH10 RT, R78A produces a large increase of fidelity as determined in forward-mutation assays , but no information related to its mutational spectrum has been reported. Interestingly, the mutational spectrum of O_R78A RT shared similar hot-spot distributions (including a major hot spot at position −34 to −36), very similar ratios of transitions versus transversions and very low frameshift error rates with those of WT and mutant O_V75I RTs. The types and frequencies of mutations generated by the O_R78A RT were different from those obtained with the O_K65R RT that also showed a higher frameshift error rate than the O_R78A, O_V75I and WT RTs. The high fidelity of O_R78A RT is further confirmed by the results of our kinetic assays. This enzyme appears to be very inefficient in misincorporating C opposite A, as well as in extending G:T and G:G mispairs. Significant differences in the misincorporation ratios of A opposite A and G:T and G:A mispair extension efficiencies were found between O_K65R and O_R78A RTs. These results could justify in part the different mutational spectra obtained with both enzymes.
Substituting an alanine residue for Arg78 has a destabilizing effect on the RT. The large effects on thermal stability observed with mutants R78A and V75I/R78A could be the result of the loss of interactions (mostly hydrogen bonds) between the side chains of Arg78 and Asp76 that could affect the stability of the RT subunits. The specific RNA-dependent DNA polymerase activity at 37 °C of the double mutant (O_V75I/R78A RT) was approximately three times lower than the activity shown by the WT enzyme. Both O_R78A and O_V75I/R78A showed largely reduced efficiency in reverse transcription–PCR reactions carried out at temperatures above 52 °C, limiting their further development as high-fidelity thermostable RTs. V75I produced a small, but detectable, reduction in reverse transcription efficiency at high temperatures ; when K65R was present, these effects were almost undetectable.
The mutants K65R and K65R/V75I showed similar accuracy in the M13mp2 lacZα forward-mutation assays. However, the observed mutational spectra were different. O_K65R RT showed a stronger tendency to generate frameshifts and produced more transversions than transitions. However, error specificities changed when V75I was present. Thus the double mutant showed a mutational spectrum with the hot spots at positions −34 to −36 and +87 found with O_V75I RT , but absent from the mutational spectrum of O_K65R RT. In addition, the double mutant showed a stronger tendency to generate one-nucleotide deletions at nucleotide runs, in comparison with the O_K65R RT. These results argue in favour of a functional interaction (or epistatic effect) between K65R and V75I, and against a dominant effect of one of these two mutations.
Further evidence of this interaction has been obtained from gel-based fidelity assays. Previous kinetic studies showed that O_V75I RT increases both misinsertion and mispair extension fidelity [14,25]. Unlike in the case of O_K65R RT, nucleotide affinity loss (i.e. increased Kd for nucleotide incorporation on mismatched template–primers) had a significant effect on the reduced mispair extension efficiencies of O_V75I RT. The double mutant K65R/V75I showed increased mispair extension fidelity for G:T and G:G mismatches, in comparison with the single mutants K65R and V75I. The increased accuracy of the double mutant was largely dominated by a Kd effect in the case of G:T mispair extension, whereas in the case of G:G mispairs both the kpol and Kd values were affected by the presence of K65R together with V75I. Interestingly, these effects on G:T and G:G mispair extension were also observed with the R78A mutant. Interactions between the tip of the β3–β4 hairpin loop (including Lys65) and the dNTP could be greatly affected by removal of the side chain of Arg78, which could have a strong influence on the conformation of the β3–β4 hairpin loop and its interactions with the template nucleotide at position +1.
In summary, we provide evidence that demonstrates that the fidelity of lentiviral RTs (i.e. HIV-1 RT) can be improved to the levels shown by the more faithful MLV RT, without altering the stability or the specific DNA polymerase activity of the enzyme. O_K65R, O_K65R/V75I and O_R78A RTs showed >10-fold increased accuracy for base substitutions in comparison with the WT enzyme. Base-substitution error rates were similar to those obtained with MLV RT. However, the MLV RT showed a higher error rate for frameshifts (e.g. >3 times higher than for K65R) and a stronger tendency to produce transversions versus transitions in forward-mutation assays. Overall error rates for MLV RT are also in good agreement with previous estimates obtained with the M13mp2 lacZα forward-mutation assay [5,6]. However, pre-steady-state kinetic analyses of fidelity using MLV RT were limited by its low catalytic efficiency in comparison with HIV-1 RTs  (results not shown), as well as by the requirement for high concentrations of enzyme. The higher fidelity of the MLV RT in comparison with the HIV-1 RT has been shown previously in gel-based assays using synthetic heteropolymeric template–primers [41–44]. Most of those studies have been carried out under steady-state conditions. Reported misinsertion and mispair extension ratios for MLV RT were ~2–8 times lower than those obtained with HIV-1 RT [42–44]. However, results were strongly dependent on the sequence and the template–primer used. Therefore, in this scenario, forward-mutation assays provide a more reliable estimate of fidelity differences between both enzymes.
Although the role of K65R in the acquisition of drug resistance in HIV-1 group O RT has not been studied in detail in the clinical setting, a recent report estimates that ~10% of the HIV-1 (group M subtype B) clinical isolates bearing the K65R mutation also contain V75I . It remains to be determined whether the RTs found in vivo display high fidelity and if this property has any impact on viral evolution. In any case, the RTs described in the present study combine increased efficiency of reverse transcription at high temperatures with high fidelity, and should be of great utility in the amplification of RNA targets.
Verónica Barrioluengo obtained the mutants, designed and performed the reverse transcription–PCR and fidelity assays, and analysed the results. Verónica Barrioluengo and Mar Álvarez purified the enzymes and performed the DNA polymerase activity assays to assess the thermal stability of RTs. Daniela Barbieri purified the R78A mutant RT and determined its fidelity with the forward-mutation assay. Luis Menéndez-Arias conceived the idea, supervised the project and wrote the paper.
This work was supported by the Ministry of Science and Innovation of Spain [grant numbers BIO2007/60319 and BIO2010/15542), the Fundación para la Investigación y Prevención del SIDA en España (FIPSE) [grant number 36771/08], the Fondo de Investigación Sanitaria (through the “Red Temática de Investigación Cooperativa en SIDA”) [grant number RD06/006], and an institutional grant from the Fundación Ramón Areces.
We thank Dr Thomas Kunkel for helpful advice.
Abbreviations: DTT, dithiothreitol; MLV, murine leukaemia virus; RT, reverse transcriptase; WT, wild-type
- © The Authors Journal compilation © 2011 Biochemical Society